Nauseated by “the hordes of envious mediocrities rejoicing at his downfall”, Ayn Rand wrote this play “to feature the confrontation of the two extremes, two opposite ways of facing existence: passionate self-assertiveness, self-confidence, ambition, audacity, independence – versus conventionality, servility, envy, hatred, power-lust”.
The play shocks and teases with its bold lyrics. Faulkner’s suicide note: “I found only two enjoyable things on this earth whose every door was open to me: My whip over the world and Karen Andre.” Or Karen explaining Faulkner’s philosophy: “Bjorn never thought of things as right or wrong. To him, it was only: you can or you can’t. He always could.” Or the quiet understanding of true love: “there can be no more trouble between Herr Faulkner and Miss Andre as between you and your face in the mirror!” Or the court questioning the nature of love: “wasn’t it fear, not love, that held him in your hands?” Or the gangster Regan’s explanation of his blind devotion even in unrequited love: “do you think we are both so low that if something passes us to which one kneels, we no longer have eyes to see it? I loved her; (but) she loved Faulkner. That’s our only proof.”
Using a criminal as an example of heroic individualism is something Ayn Rand was often criticized for. A casual reader can take a very negative message and start justifying selfishness or treat all rules with disdain. However, Rand did clarify that “I do not think that a swindler is a heroic character… But for the purpose of dramatizing the conflict of independence versus conformity, a criminal – a social outcast – can be an eloquent symbol… A career of crime is not, in fact, the way to implement one’s self-esteem.”
Post A Comment
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!